![]() ![]() "There are issues we have not filed with the court yet, facts, that involve the sexual harassment prong of the EFAA," Hodas said, referring to the federal law known as the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act. Hodas instead wanted the court to provide more clarity on what more he could reveal about this issue under the law without violating the disputed NDA. But Hodas declined to go into further detail, saying it might violate the disputed NDA, which required Herman to keep her private life with Woods confidential. Herman worked at his restaurant, The Woods, in Jupiter, Florida, until she resigned in 2020.Īt a court hearing in Stuart, Florida, May 9, Metzger asked Herman’s attorney, Benjamin Hodas, to clarify this part of his case. Herman didn’t get into any detail about it until May 5, when her attorney filed a court document that said Woods pursued a sexual relationship with her when she was his employee at his restaurant and then forced her to sign an NDA about it – or be fired from her job if she did not. "Herman additionally has not 'denied' that the clear terms of the NDA require the resolution of her disputes, claims or controversies with Woods via binding, confidential arbitration." What was her sexual harassment case? ![]() "Importantly, Herman has not 'denied' that her signature is on the NDA," the judge ruled. In a court filing dated May 5, her attorney also said Herman didn’t even recall signing the NDA in question. ![]() Established in 2022, such laws were designed to eliminate the use of NDAs and private arbitration as a way for sexual predators to avoid public accountability. Her attorney even cited new federal laws in which NDAs and forced arbitration agreements don’t apply in disputes involving sexual harassment. In March, Herman filed this lawsuit against Woods to challenge that NDA and have the court declare it invalid. This led Woods to try to steer the dispute into private arbitration pursuant to the terms of the NDA. In response to her ouster from the home, Herman sued the trust that Woods established for that house, claiming more than $30 million in damages. But the larger dispute started with their breakup in October, when Herman said Woods arranged to kick her out of his house in violation of an oral tenancy agreement she said she had to keep living there for several more years. The issue at hand was about whether this dispute between these two former lovers should be resolved privately in arbitration under terms of the nondisclosure agreement (NDA) that Woods' attorney said they signed in 2017. The Clerk of the Court shall administratively close this case." What was this about? ![]() The parties shall advise the Court once arbitration has been completed. "Pursuant to applicable law, this case is stayed pending completion of arbitration. "The parties are ordered to submit this action to arbitration," Metzger ruled. Judge Elizabeth Metzger issued the ruling late Wednesday, handing the famed golfer a victory in his quest to keep his private conflict with Erica Herman out of the public eye. A state judge in Florida has ruled in favor of Tiger Woods in his public dispute against his ex-girlfriend, ordering the matter to be resolved in private arbitration after it spilled into public court with allegations of sexual harassment and a messy breakup between the two in October. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |